What type of patient move should an EMT use if the patient is in immediate danger of collapse?

In situations where a patient is in immediate danger of collapse, an emergency move is the appropriate choice. This type of move is typically employed when there is an imminent threat to the patient's safety or health that necessitates quick action. For example, if a patient is in a hazardous environment—such as a busy street or near a potential fire—an emergency move allows the EMT to swiftly relocate the patient to a safer area, even if it means disregarding spinal precautions temporarily.

An emergency move is characterized by its speed and urgency, ensuring that the patient is removed from danger as rapidly as possible. It prioritizes immediate safety over technique, which becomes essential when the patient's condition is precarious.

In contrast, non-urgent, delayed, or urgent moves are employed in different scenarios where the immediate threat does not require immediate relocation. Non-urgent moves are typically used when the patient's condition is stable and there is no significant risk, while delayed movements may be indicated when there is time to ensure that the move is safe for both the patient and the ambulance crew. Urgent moves are used when the situation is serious but does not pose an immediate threat of collapse. Thus, understanding the distinction between these types of moves is crucial for effective and safe emergency response.